Effects
Report Date September 15, 2007
From October 2006 to
February 2007, the R.J. Corman Railroad Co. ran a test on G2 Diesel.
The locomotive was operating under its normal workload running a blend
of 50% G2 Diesel and 50% petroleum diesel. An important note on this
test is that even running on this high concentration of G2 during the
coldest part of the winter in northeast Ohio, there were no problems
with fuel viscosity or gelling. The purpose of the test was to observe
the effects of G2 on the engine and to look for any possible
operational problems that may have occured during this period. The
locomotive proved so reliable that it has been running on
concentrations as high as 100% G2 to date (Sept 15, 2007).The
locomotive pictured, #4119 has been used in three tests as of this
report date.
The following pictures document the engine inspection in February 2007
after four months of operation on the G2 Diesel blend.
Inside the R.J Corman Railroad Co. service bay.
Fig. 1
The side of the EMD model 16-645BC diesel engine. The mechanic is
removing the top cover to allow access to the injectors and rocker
assemblies (Fig.3-4). The round access ports are where the technicians
can view the intake/exhaust ports and piston sides (Fig. 5-6).
Fig. 2 The technician removes the fuel injectors.
Fig. 3 Three sample injectors.
Left: A new injector, never used.
Middle: This injector was in service in a diesel engine of the same type
as the test engine for 6 months. Note the early formation of carbon
deposits in this short time.
Right: This injector from the test engine is four years old. After four years
running on petroleum diesel, it was then run on 50% G2 Diesel and
50% petroleum diesel for four months.Note that the G2 blend has
reopened the clogged injector ports and removed most of the years of
carbon buildup.
Fig. 4 This is the view into the injector seat. The light colored area in the
center is the top of the piston head with the threaded hole visible in
the center.Note the complete lack of carbon.The threading is usually
encrusted with carbon to the point that it must be re-tapped to remove
the piston.
Fig. 5 This is a view of the piston head, through the intake/exhaust ports.
Note that the majority of shiny carbon buildup has been cleaned from the
pistonís surface. Besides allowing for a more efficient combustion and
transfer of energy, the removal of the carbon from the piston allows for
more efficient cooling and longer intervals between maintenance.
The
ports that are visible here are, under normal circumstances, partially
clogged with carbon and routinely need sandblasting to open completely
for efficient operation. Here you can see that G2 has cleaned these
surfaces to the bare metal, increasing airflow to the ignition chamber.
Fig. 6 A view of the piston rings and side. The increased lubricity of G2
and lower operating temperature prevent scarring or burning of rings,
extending the intervals between major maintenance requirements.